The leaders of the KDP, KDU-SL and TOP 09 want to talk to the head of the hacker, Ivan Bartosz, about the call of his party’s parliamentary club to replace the head of civilian intelligence, Petr Mlyenko. They told reporters Monday after the launch of Spolo’s campaign for municipal and Senate elections. Prime Minister Peter Fiala (ODS) expects to clarify the matter on Tuesday.
Bartosz said he wants to discuss in the government the issue of civilian intelligence chief Petr Mellinka (illustration image) | Photo: Rene Volvik | Source: iROZHLAS.cz
Bartosz said to the servant n . diary, who wants to discuss in the government about the head of civilian intelligence Peter Mlinka, because last week at the meeting of the Security Committee and the Civil Intelligence Oversight Committee in the House of Representatives, new facts emerged about the hackers. .
Student of the Security Committee: The public interrogation of the heads of the secret services is not happy. But there was no other way
Read the article
Czech television reported, on Sunday, that the Pirate Club called for the replacement of the director of the Office of Foreign Relations and Information. Like the opposition, the hacker points to Mlinka’s contacts with businessman Michal Riedel, accused in the Prague-Dozymetre corruption case.
The issue is also one of the reasons for the vote of no confidence in the government initiated by the opposition. It will take place on Thursday, as the pirates will support the government. He added, “It means nothing to the government. It is an expression of the opinion of the Parliamentary Pirate Club. I will talk about that with President Bartosz in the coming days.”
He later specified that politicians would clarify the matter on Tuesday. According to the Prime Minister, the government did not find reasons to dismiss Mlignik, and according to him, this position was also confirmed by the meeting of the Parliamentary Security Committee and the Parliamentary Standing Committee for Monitoring the Activities of the Office of Foreign Relations and Information last week.
New information
But Bartosz said new information was heard at the committee and committee meeting. Pirates team leader Deník N.
“Some doubts remain with the pirates and we will discuss them in more detail with the coalition partners,” he added.
The House Security Committee indirectly supported Melchenko as chief of civilian intelligence
Read the article
The President of TOP 09 and the Chamber of Deputies, Markéta Pekarová Adamová, stated that although she and Bartoš discussed many things several times last week, he did not draw attention to the upcoming challenge of the Pirate Club at all. “He’s part of it too, so I expect him to at least give us some advance notice,” she said. In her opinion, it is not about proper communication between government parties.
And the pirates in the decision of the Parliamentary Club indicate the possibility of a breach of the coalition agreement, because according to which the parties must choose qualified and trustworthy personalities to take up leadership positions.
“I expect them to identify what violated the coalition agreement. KDU-ČSL President and Minister of Labor and Social Affairs Marianne Yureka said I don’t see a reason there.” He also wants to talk to Bartosz, according to him, the hacker chief did not anticipate any problems beforehand.
server Economic newspaper On Thursday, I reported that the hackers would vote in an internal party referendum on a decision to distance themselves from the government’s coalition move around the director of civilian intelligence. Al-Khadim wrote that even if the hackers condemned the government’s approach, this did not mean the collapse of the government.
Pirate voting will begin on Friday, September 2nd and end on the following Monday evening. The all-party referendum was proposed by Marek Špisek, a former National Security Bureau (NSB) employee from the 1990s and a hacker member.
“We consider it right for the person concerned to stop holding the office. Hospodářské noviny quotes the proposed decision that joint responsibility for government decisions is detrimental to our good reputation.
